<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>isthewebsitedown</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.isthewebsitedown.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.isthewebsitedown.com</link>
	<description>if you are asking, probably not. if I am asking, probably so</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 23:04:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>interesting idea</title>
		<link>http://www.isthewebsitedown.com/2010/02/interesting-idea/</link>
		<comments>http://www.isthewebsitedown.com/2010/02/interesting-idea/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 23:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isthewebsitedown.com/?p=191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[prompt for anonymous questions....
http://www.formspring.me/isthesitedown
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>prompt for anonymous questions....</p>
<p><a href="http://www.formspring.me/isthesitedown" target="_blank">http://www.formspring.me/isthesitedown</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.isthewebsitedown.com/2010/02/interesting-idea/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Postman&#8217;s 4th idea</title>
		<link>http://www.isthewebsitedown.com/2010/02/postmans-4th-idea/</link>
		<comments>http://www.isthewebsitedown.com/2010/02/postmans-4th-idea/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 20:59:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[New Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isthewebsitedown.com/?p=180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am 30 now, which means that I can still remember using BBS's and installing a pre-5.0 version of netscape. In short, I am old.
My job caters well to the fact that I am old. I don't really bother memorizing anything any more. In an age when I can type in a few words to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am 30 now, which means that I can still remember using BBS's and installing a pre-5.0 version of netscape. In short, I am old.</p>
<p>My job caters well to the fact that I am old. I don't really bother memorizing anything any more. In an age when I can type in a few words to a song into google and immediately pull up the lyrics, a link to buy it, 37 mashups using it and  a video of a cat playing a keyboard to it, most things simply do not register as important enough to dedicate the attention required to memorize them. As a consequence, I believe that my memory is getting weaker. If it were up to my retention abilities, both the good and bad would be forgotten quickly. Thanks to gmail, archive.org and google web cache, however, I am free the from the responsibility of ever remembering anything that is said to me or that i said to anyone else. A little over 10 years ago, Neil Postman wrote  a talk called <em>5 Things We Need to Know About Technological Change</em>, in which he explains in the most distilled way I can imagine a sort of "heads up" to the leadership of the world about what is coming in the next 10-20 years. The 4th point in his wholly amazing work is summarized below:</p>
<blockquote><p>Here is the fourth idea: Technological change is not additive; it is      ecological. I can explain this best by an analogy. What happens if we      place a drop of red dye into a beaker of clear water? Do we have clear      water plus a spot of red dye? Obviously not. We have a new coloration to      every molecule of water. That is what I mean by ecological change. A new      medium does not add something; it changes everything. In the year 1500,      after the printing press was invented, you did not have old Europe plus      the printing press. You had a different Europe. After television, America      was not America plus television. Television gave a new coloration to every      political campaign, to every home, to every school, to every church, to      every industry, and so on.</p></blockquote>
<p>The addition of an automatic stenographer for every thought I bang out to my wife or father, or friends has many benefits. I can easily refer back to see if I said something incorrectly, or missed an important detail. I can pull up emails that were sent 5 years ago (I was on the early curve of the gmail thing) and get exact quotes from people I have not seen in years. The issue is that my changed ecology allows me to easily re-kindle old grudges. Before Christmas, I was sent an email response to a note I had sent to a relative. The email I got was, in a word, inflammatory. Possibly more so than the author had intended. In the 2 months since, my anger had moved from foaming-at-the-mouth seething rage, to a much more restrained irritation. Last week, a conversation with my brother caused me to search for the message in question and the second I re-read it, I was immediately filled with the same emotions once again. This automatic record has the capacity to turn every little offense into a Hatfield Vs McCoy level feud.</p>
<p>I have been convicted recently about my treatment of another family member, again fueled by a perfect record of the wrongs I have 'suffered.' Even if I am justified and wholly 'right' (or as much as so as a human can be), am I allowing this shift in my spiritual ecology, the environment in which my faith exists, to be a less-Christ-like forgiver of wrongs done to me?  A friend of mine recently wrote in an article for <em>Collide</em> magazine on this subject. He said:</p>
<blockquote><p>Theologian Miroslav Volf, author of <em>The End of Memory: Remembering Rightly in a Violent World</em>, says that when we try to deal with the past, we often make one of two mistakes. Sometimes we downplay what happened, saying, “Aw, it wasn’t that big of a deal. I only lost, like, six followers over it.” This way, we don’t have to forgive the event as it actually happened. Other times, when we hold resentment against someone, we inflate an event in order to make the offender look worse. “She posted that over the entire Internet.” But Volf, who underwent a months-long interrogation during the Yugoslavian conflict, suggests that a major part of forgiveness is not forgetting, but remembering rightly so we can forgive what really happened.</p>
<p>For Christians, this means that the Internet’s ability to help us remember rightly is a chance to practice a theologically-informed, true kind of forgiveness. Rather than downplay an incident or cut people off every time they annoy us, we have the chance to look at the past with Google-like accuracy and choose to stop holding those wrongs against those who harmed us.</p></blockquote>
<p>Wow. For me, this is about the hardest thing in the world. I like to pretend that I never play the victim and that I will just take all kinds of abuse without saying a word. The truth is, though, that I act worse than my kids when I am wronged. The hardest parts of the Christian life are the things that fly most in the face of our instincts with no payout in return. When we give financially, we feel good about it. When we serve in a ministry, we get kudos from other believers. When we forgive someone who has wronged us without throwing it back in their face, we a) open ourselves up to getting hurt again and b) walk away from our right to be right, to be the blameless one. The hardest part for me is that second one, the one where I have to treat the other person like they are as forgiven as God says they are. I don't get to be a martyr any more. I hope that someday I will be as able to forgive and treat another believer as blameless as gracefully as our savior and some of his more sanctified children have show me in the past.</p>
<p>References:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mat.upm.es/~jcm/neil-postman--five-things.html" target="_blank">http://www.mat.upm.es/~jcm/neil-postman--five-things.html</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.collidemagazine.com/article/print/291/i-will-remember-your-tweets-no-more" target="_blank">http://www.collidemagazine.com/article/print/291/i-will-remember-your-tweets-no-more</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.isthewebsitedown.com/2010/02/postmans-4th-idea/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LogMeIn Error &#8220;failed to start remote control process: 5&#8243;</title>
		<link>http://www.isthewebsitedown.com/2009/12/logmein-error-failed-to-start-remote-control-process-5/</link>
		<comments>http://www.isthewebsitedown.com/2009/12/logmein-error-failed-to-start-remote-control-process-5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 15:42:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Antivirus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Logmein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misc. software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isthewebsitedown.com/?p=172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Client called last night with the above error when trying to connect to any of 6 workstations in an office in Virginia from any other machine with any browser. Quick check on google returned no results, so I called LogMeIn support. Apparently, an update released yesterday for AVG misidentifies a component of LogMeIn as Vundo.J [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Client called last night with the above error when trying to connect to any of 6 workstations in an office in Virginia from any other machine with any browser. Quick check on google returned no results, so I called LogMeIn support. Apparently, an update released yesterday for AVG misidentifies a component of LogMeIn as Vundo.J and blocks it from accessing the internet. It will also block new installations of LogMeIn, causing the "starting services" step to fail over and over again.</p>
<p>The band-aid is easy, just exclude c:\program files\logmein from your resident shield. The folks at LogMeIn also urged me to contact AVG support about the issue, as they want to get it fixed as quickly as possible and they figure that more voices will make the fix happen more quickly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.isthewebsitedown.com/2009/12/logmein-error-failed-to-start-remote-control-process-5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Download HKCRScan.exe tool for troubleshooting MS Article ID 823159</title>
		<link>http://www.isthewebsitedown.com/2009/12/hkcrscan-exe-tool-for-troubleshooting-ms-article-id-823159/</link>
		<comments>http://www.isthewebsitedown.com/2009/12/hkcrscan-exe-tool-for-troubleshooting-ms-article-id-823159/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 19:05:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Exchange 2003]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utils]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 2003]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isthewebsitedown.com/?p=152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Users were getting a "HTTP/1.1 503 Service Unavailable" on both https://&#60;servername&#62;/Exchange , https://&#60;servername&#62;/Public and on https://&#60;servername&#62;/microsoft-server-activesync, they get a login prompt and then a "HTTP 501/HTTP 505"
The below tool should be run from the command prompt. It should identify and remove registry keys over the 259 character limit. It will kick back any errors. If [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Users were getting a "HTTP/1.1 503 Service Unavailable" on both https://&lt;servername&gt;/Exchange , https://&lt;servername&gt;/Public and on https://&lt;servername&gt;/microsoft-server-activesync, they get a login prompt and then a "HTTP 501/HTTP 505"</p>
<p>The below tool should be run from the command prompt. It should identify and remove registry keys over the 259 character limit. It will kick back any errors. If you have null keys (keys that are faulty but unremovable), you can use <a href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/bb897445.aspx" target="_blank">RootKitRevealer </a>from sysinternals and get rid of them. I understand that <a href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/bb897448.aspx" target="_blank">regdelnull</a> can do something similar, but in this case, it was a corrupt key, not a key with null characters.</p>
<p>In my case, the affected key was relating to the driver for the Intel storage controller (VEN_8086&amp;DEV_24D3&amp;SUBSYS_458015D9&amp;REV_02). Not cool. I could not delete or rename the key and could not set/view permissions on it. Ran RootKitRevealer, which caused a stop error/reboot (crap) but successfully removed the key. <span style="text-decoration: underline;">IN OTHER WORDS, DO NOT DO THIS IF YOU DO NOT HAVE A <strong>TESTED </strong>BACKUP</span>.</p>
<p>"To help troubleshoot this issue, run the HKCRScan tool 		  (HKCRScan.exe). The HKCRScan tool enumerates the HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT registry 		  hive to locate subkeys that contain more than 259 characters. Additionally, 		  HKCRScan helps determine if there is an invalid discretionary access control 		  list by returning error code 0x5. This error code means "Access denied" when it 		  enumerates a registry key. The HKCRScan tool is an internal tool developed by 		  Microsoft."</p>
<p><a href="http://www.isthewebsitedown.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/HKCRScan.zip" target="_blank">Download: HKCRScan</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.isthewebsitedown.com/2009/12/hkcrscan-exe-tool-for-troubleshooting-ms-article-id-823159/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Most useful new content to come from Yahoo(!) in years.</title>
		<link>http://www.isthewebsitedown.com/2009/11/most-useful-new-content-to-come-from-yahoo-in-years/</link>
		<comments>http://www.isthewebsitedown.com/2009/11/most-useful-new-content-to-come-from-yahoo-in-years/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 13:45:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DNS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utils]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isthewebsitedown.com/?p=140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a very good overview of the public DNS system. Kinda gives you a feel for the fragile nature of the beast. Also, it gives some great information on the role that crap DNS plays in hidden performance problems.
Of course, I love using OpenDNS for testing, as most ISP's DNS servers just plain suck.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://developer.yahoo.net/blog/archives/2009/11/an_engineers_gu.html" target="_blank">This is a very good overview of the public DNS system</a>. Kinda gives you a feel for the fragile nature of the beast. Also, it gives some great information on the role that crap DNS plays in hidden performance problems.</p>
<p>Of course, I love using <a href="http://www.opendns.com/" target="_blank">OpenDNS</a> for testing, as most ISP's DNS servers just plain suck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.isthewebsitedown.com/2009/11/most-useful-new-content-to-come-from-yahoo-in-years/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why is this not being shouted from the roof of the home of every content creator?</title>
		<link>http://www.isthewebsitedown.com/2009/11/why-is-this-not-being-shouted-from-the-roof-of-the-home-of-every-content-creator/</link>
		<comments>http://www.isthewebsitedown.com/2009/11/why-is-this-not-being-shouted-from-the-roof-of-the-home-of-every-content-creator/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 02:36:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isthewebsitedown.com/?p=138</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To anyone who has ever created anything of value, and had it cheapened by the culture of entitlement so pervasive in the US and the rest of the internet-connected world, Rupert Murdoch has declared that Google is mortal and, together, we can kill it.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To anyone who has ever created anything of value, and had it cheapened by the culture of entitlement so pervasive in the US and the rest of the internet-connected world, Rupert Murdoch has declared that <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/11/17/murdoch_google_analysis/page3.html" target="_blank">Google is mortal and, together, we can kill it.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.isthewebsitedown.com/2009/11/why-is-this-not-being-shouted-from-the-roof-of-the-home-of-every-content-creator/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Headlines that can be misread&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.isthewebsitedown.com/2009/11/headlines-that-can-be-misread/</link>
		<comments>http://www.isthewebsitedown.com/2009/11/headlines-that-can-be-misread/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:59:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isthewebsitedown.com/?p=134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Texas Honors Student Charged In Plot To Kill Dad
http://www.kwtx.com/home/headlines/72568237.html
I mean, unless the guy was a real jerk or something. ๏̯͡๏﴿
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Texas Honors Student Charged In Plot To Kill Dad</p>
<p><a href="http://www.kwtx.com/home/headlines/72568237.html" target="_blank">http://www.kwtx.com/home/headlines/72568237.html</a></p>
<p>I mean, unless the guy was a real jerk or something. ๏̯͡๏﴿</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.isthewebsitedown.com/2009/11/headlines-that-can-be-misread/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Imagine if someone could compete with Wal-mart on price&#8230;.</title>
		<link>http://www.isthewebsitedown.com/2009/11/imagine-if-someone-could-compete-with-wal-mart-on-price/</link>
		<comments>http://www.isthewebsitedown.com/2009/11/imagine-if-someone-could-compete-with-wal-mart-on-price/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 22:57:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Utils]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isthewebsitedown.com/?p=125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They can't of course. But just imagine that they could.
Because that is exactly what the new wave of web services are doing. See, when you write code, it doesn't normally cost you much to use it the 2nd through 9 billionth time. That first one is expensive. Stores like Amazon.com make money hand over fist [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They can't of course. But just imagine that they could.</p>
<p>Because that is exactly what the new wave of web services are doing. See, when you write code, it doesn't normally cost you much to use it the 2nd through 9 billionth time. That first one is expensive. Stores like Amazon.com make money hand over fist because they have innovated on so many levels that they have become almost unstoppable at what they do. But thousands of little sites are popping up everwhere that are undercutting the established market leaders. <a href="http://www.mint.com" target="_blank">Mint.com</a> is attacking Quickbooks. <a href="http://www.mailchimp.com/" target="_blank">MailChimp </a>can beat out ConstantContact for most smaller tasks for free. <a href="http://www.freepdfconvert.com" target="_blank">freepdfconvert.com</a> can handle most of the tasks that people use Acrobat Standard or Pro for.</p>
<p>Most people don't need a Swiss Army knife. They really just want a great knife or can opener when they need it, preferably one that is easy to use and even better, free. By focusing on very simple, individualized tasks, people can pretty easily reduce the cost of that first roll out of the software and then make a small amount on advertising revenue from there out. Expenses are very low (as are expectations), and changes can be made rapidly based on feedback.</p>
<p>In order to take down a skyscraper, you can either try to attack it broadside with a wrecking ball or you can go after the foundation with a super soaker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.isthewebsitedown.com/2009/11/imagine-if-someone-could-compete-with-wal-mart-on-price/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Server 2008 R2 Considerations:</title>
		<link>http://www.isthewebsitedown.com/2009/11/server-2008-r2-considerations/</link>
		<comments>http://www.isthewebsitedown.com/2009/11/server-2008-r2-considerations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[R2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 2008]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isthewebsitedown.com/?p=122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As Aaron posted over at BinaryWar.com, Windows Server 2008 R2 is the first release of Windows to be 64bit only. We knew it was coming, with SQL and Exchange having already made the jump. With the majority of us still supporting mostly 32bit clients, there are some special considerations to keep in mind when you [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Aaron posted over at <a href="http://www.binarywar.com/2009/11/windows-server-2008-r2-is-64-bit-only/" target="_self">BinaryWar.com</a>, Windows Server 2008 R2 is the first release of Windows to be 64bit only. We knew it was coming, with SQL and Exchange having already made the jump. With the majority of us still supporting mostly 32bit clients, there are some special considerations to keep in mind when you are planning a deployment of a 64 bit server for general small office use (as opposed to a higer performance or higher demand machine, traditionally the targets of 64 bit architecture).:</p>
<ol>
<li>Applications compatibility - Will your companies applications run ( in a supported fashion) on a 64 bit server? Any modern application should at least have a forthcoming update to support 64bit, but there are plenty of non-modern applications out there that are lagging behind. In the event that it is not supported, your best option may be to either host a VM on your new 64 bit server, or run both of them on a hypervisor. Call  your vendor and get their support statement in writing. You do not want to get halfway through a migration and find out that you will have to run beta code to make it work, sort of, in the meantime.</li>
<li>Backups - Most newer versions of BackupExec support 64 bit, so you should be fine there, if that is what you are running. Obviously if you are using the built in backup, it would be supported as well. <strong>Make sure that whatever device (especially tape drives) you are using to back up to is supported</strong>.</li>
<li>Printers - Ah yes, the lowly print server. Plenty of printers have either crap 64bit drivers or nothing at all. Either plan on replacing those printers or using plan b from item 1 above.</li>
<li>Antivirus - Don't forget this. You need it and the chances that your existing install package will work on 64bit are basically zero</li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.isthewebsitedown.com/2009/11/server-2008-r2-considerations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Upgrade path from Symantec Endpoint Protection 11 Trialware to Full Version&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.isthewebsitedown.com/2009/11/upgrade-path-from-symantec-endpoint-protection-11-trialware-to-full-version/</link>
		<comments>http://www.isthewebsitedown.com/2009/11/upgrade-path-from-symantec-endpoint-protection-11-trialware-to-full-version/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 17:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Symantec Endpoint Protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utils]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isthewebsitedown.com/?p=119</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There isn't one. That is all.
Source
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There isn't one. That is all.</p>
<p><a href="http://service1.symantec.com/support/ent-security.nsf/854fa02b4f5013678825731a007d06af/a6e631b2d15bf73e88257481007852f6?OpenDocument" target="_blank">Source</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.isthewebsitedown.com/2009/11/upgrade-path-from-symantec-endpoint-protection-11-trialware-to-full-version/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
